[Multipar] Option?

Questions and bug reports for Beta releases should be posted here.

[Multipar] Option?

Postby joao » February 28th, 2011, 4:29 pm

Dev,

is it possible to start working with multipar? I installed multipar a while ago ans came to the conclusion that it repairs alot quicker than par2.exe
Maybe an option for the beta 3 version of SABnzbd?

Keep up the good work!
joao
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: November 30th, 2010, 8:01 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby inpheaux » February 28th, 2011, 5:37 pm

No clue!

Would you like to do some benchmarking for us?

Edit: Major requirement for SABnzbd is that we must have a CLI option.
User avatar
inpheaux
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 694
Joined: January 16th, 2008, 10:14 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby joao » February 28th, 2011, 8:59 pm

inpheaux wrote:No clue!

Would you like to do some benchmarking for us?

Edit: Major requirement for SABnzbd is that we must have a CLI option.


CLI options:
Code: Select all
Usage
c(reate) [f,fu,r,n,p,m,c,d,in,u] <par file> [input files]
v(erify) [  d,i,u,b] <par file>
r(epair) [m,d,i,u,b] <par file>
l(ist)   [u,h] <par file>

Option
 /f    : Use file-list instead of files
 /fu   : Use file-list which is encoded with UTF-8
 /r<n> : Rate of redundancy (%)
 /n<n> : Number of parity volumes
 /p<n> : First parity volume number
 /m<n> : Memory usage
 /c"*" : Set comment
 /d"*" : Set directory of input files
 /i    : Recreate index file
 /in   : Do not create index file
 /u    : Console output is encoded with UTF-8
 /b    : Backup existing files before repair
 /h    : List hash value of input files


Benchmark is on the way
joao
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: November 30th, 2010, 8:01 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby premiso » February 28th, 2011, 10:36 pm

[Removed due to innaccuracy]

So the executables included in the archive are not just par2 :) I thought that they just referenced that.
Last edited by premiso on February 28th, 2011, 10:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
premiso
Release Testers
Release Testers
 
Posts: 15
Joined: June 28th, 2010, 12:43 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby john3voltas » March 1st, 2011, 3:36 am

Hi Joao.
I'm not sure which multipar you are referring to.
Could you leave a link to it's website?
I'm curious if it's a only-windows tool or if it's also available for *nix.
Cheers
SABnzbd 0.6.0Alpha11 on Fedora 14-64bit laptop.
Usenet-News, TeraNews, newszilla6.xs4all.nl and reader.ipv6.xsnews.nl.
IPv6 connections powered by Hurricane Electric.
Can pull 30Mbit nntp on a 30Mbit FTTH link.
User avatar
john3voltas
Release Testers
Release Testers
 
Posts: 143
Joined: January 17th, 2008, 6:35 pm
Location: Lisbon/Portugal

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby joao » March 1st, 2011, 8:15 am

john3voltas wrote:Hi Joao.
I'm not sure which multipar you are referring to.
Could you leave a link to it's website?
I'm curious if it's a only-windows tool or if it's also available for *nix.
Cheers


Hi,

i uploaded @ http://www.megaupload.com/?d=FZFJV3GZ
joao
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: November 30th, 2010, 8:01 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby Rezzar » March 1st, 2011, 11:20 am

Last edited by Rezzar on March 1st, 2011, 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rezzar
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 2
Joined: March 1st, 2011, 11:18 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby mck » July 10th, 2012, 2:25 am

bump
any chance this is going to happen?
Because multipar is much more reliable and faster than par2cmdline even when using it via wine.
mck
Newbie
Newbie
 
Posts: 14
Joined: August 28th, 2008, 8:44 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby shypike » July 10th, 2012, 4:59 am

mck wrote:Because multipar is much more reliable and faster than par2cmdline even when using it via wine.


The speed might be true, but do you have anything to backup your reliability claim?
The Windows and OSX distributions already have alternative par2 programs.
By my experience the classic par2cmdline is the most reliable one, but also the slowest.
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16541
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 1:49 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby smidley » July 20th, 2012, 6:30 pm

smidley
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
 
Posts: 55
Joined: January 30th, 2010, 12:34 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby eXisTa » August 15th, 2012, 5:09 am

Please replace par2 with multipar so we can use par3 files.
In the past two weeks I downloaded multiple files wich had *.pa3 files.
Only with multi-par I was able to use them.
User avatar
eXisTa
Release Testers
Release Testers
 
Posts: 31
Joined: July 3rd, 2009, 4:07 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby sander » August 15th, 2012, 6:47 am

eXisTa wrote:Please replace par2 with multipar so we can use par3 files.
In the past two weeks I downloaded multiple files wich had *.pa3 files.
Only with multi-par I was able to use them.


I found a poster "ikbenhetmaar" with a lot of pa3 posts: DVD's with the usual rar files, and then pa3 files (instead of par files).

I created an NZB, and downloaded it without problems: apparently all rars were available.

So I edited the .NZB file and removed a few lines from the .rar parts. Downloading that NZB resulted in "Unpacking failed, CRC error", and no rar or pa3 files; just an attempt by SAB to create the real files. Strange. Or is my method wrong? EDIT: Oh, I found some stuff in 'tempie'... TBC

I will now only download the crippled NZB and see if I can manually repair it. If so, maybe a pa3-postprocessing script would be a workaround for the time being?
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 3:22 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby shypike » August 15th, 2012, 9:46 am

People uploading with par3 files are fools.
Multipar is Windows-only.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to start supporting non-standard methods.
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
 
Posts: 16541
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 1:49 pm

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby eXisTa » August 16th, 2012, 3:12 am

shypike wrote:People uploading with par3 files are fools.
Multipar is Windows-only.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to start supporting non-standard methods.


I couldn't agree more with that, maybe there could be a mechanism in wich SAB ignores par3-files or cancels the download?
User avatar
eXisTa
Release Testers
Release Testers
 
Posts: 31
Joined: July 3rd, 2009, 4:07 am

Re: [Multipar] Option?

Postby sander » August 16th, 2012, 6:57 am

shypike wrote:People uploading with par3 files are fools. Multipar is Windows-only.


Cool ... with more and more developers on OSX and Linux, more and more software is available for OSX and Linux. And not because a certain sales or product manager has decided so, but just because of the developers that want to develop on their own platform and use their own products.
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
 
Posts: 3482
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 3:22 pm

Next

Return to Beta Releases