Search found 8807 matches
- March 17th, 2024, 1:20 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: 4.2.3 Update led to unrar no longer working (LSIO via docker on Synology)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 321
Re: 4.2.3 Update led to unrar no longer working (LSIO via docker on Synology)
I'm having the same problem on a OMV6 install. Using an AMD A8-3870 APU and 16gb ram. The AMD A8-3870 is a CPU from 2011, so old x86-microarchicture. And rar7 dumps core on that. Not in the hands of the SABnzbd team. Workaround is doing the job for me as well, but it would be nice if there would be...
- March 17th, 2024, 3:56 am
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Warning - giganews: Received unknown status code 503 for article ****
- Replies: 1
- Views: 69
Re: Warning - giganews: Received unknown status code 503 for article ****
The 503 is correctly handled in the first version after 4.2.3
If you want to verify that now: run the docker nightly, or the windows binary from github
https://github.com/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/blob ... er.py#L775
If you want to verify that now: run the docker nightly, or the windows binary from github
https://github.com/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/blob ... er.py#L775
- March 13th, 2024, 2:34 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: 4.2.3 Update led to unrar no longer working (LSIO via docker on Synology)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 321
Re: 4.2.3 Update led to unrar no longer working (LSIO via docker on Synology)
Seems a bug in unrar itself ... on old hardware ... ?
So which CPU are you using?
https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-s ... issues/219
So which CPU are you using?
https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-s ... issues/219
- March 13th, 2024, 11:13 am
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: API key incorrect, Use the API key from Config->General in your 3rd party program
- Replies: 3
- Views: 141
Re: API key incorrect, Use the API key from Config->General in your 3rd party program
So ... just a tiil on your own Mac?
- March 12th, 2024, 12:20 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: API key incorrect, Use the API key from Config->General in your 3rd party program
- Replies: 3
- Views: 141
Re: API key incorrect, Use the API key from Config->General in your 3rd party program
::ffff:192.168.65.1 is a notation of 192.168.65.1. So is 192.168.65.x your LAN network? If yes, then find that device and exterminate it. Kill it with fire. If not, then I wonder how it possible at all. Also: your SAB is in docker on Mac ... so I'm surprised another device can contact it all ... tha...
- March 12th, 2024, 7:53 am
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: 4.2.3 Update led to unrar no longer working (LSIO via docker on Synology)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 321
Re: 4.2.3 Update led to unrar no longer working (LSIO via docker on Synology)
2024-03-12 22:56:11,492::DEBUG::[newsunpack:860] UNRAR output: UNRAR 7.00 freeware Copyright (c) 1993-2024 Alexander Roshal 2024-03-12 22:56:11,493::INFO::[newsunpack:863] Unpacked 0 files/folders in 0 seconds Weird. A thing with unrar 7.00 (or the options you use)? Or your filesystem? What if you ...
- March 11th, 2024, 4:21 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
The \x00 was debug output. And/but Safihre made clear 1on1 that is NOT caused by the newsserver (but a SAB internal method)
- March 11th, 2024, 3:10 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
But this only happens when it's pre-checking, right? I'll turn of checking for now, and report to them. I'm using them because they bundle with a bunch of other services that I use. Thank you Sander! No: see https://forums.sabnzbd.org/viewtopic.php?p=131530#p131530 "And without "Check bef...
- March 11th, 2024, 2:59 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
This happens only at the beginning of a job, right? I can drop a support ticket and let them know their downloads are 400-ing in the beginning. Is it possible that this behaviour is interfering with the checking script? Yes, at the beginning. It looks like the server is not yet ready / is spinning ...
- March 11th, 2024, 2:28 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
My conclusion:
usenet.premiumize.me produces total and random garbage. Non-standard. Not something SAB should try to handle.
My advice: complain at them, or dump them and choose a reliable news provider
usenet.premiumize.me produces total and random garbage. Non-standard. Not something SAB should try to handle.
My advice: complain at them, or dump them and choose a reliable news provider
- March 11th, 2024, 2:27 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
And the problematic nzb: 2024-03-11 20:24:29,726::DEBUG::[newswrapper:97] SJ 200: bytearray(b'R>\r\n0 <iAdIWztxRMwPakAtm8Fh@0d673917d82003195SYgm3DUmevgaPMqTvAD\n\r\n (no posting)\r\n\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00') 2024-03-11 20:24:29,727::INFO::[notifier:1...
- March 11th, 2024, 2:23 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
garbage in the answer in the precheck: thousands of \x00 (limited to 80 characters in logging below) 2024-03-11 20:17:12,608::DEBUG::[newswrapper:97] SJ 200: bytearray(b'223 0 <JxFgMzBwLqVoRcPuJzHoSgFy-1658672651406@nyuu>\r\n@premiumize.me (no posting)\r\n\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00...
- March 11th, 2024, 2:10 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
More fun, with the 100MB test download, with sabnzbd WARNING a few seconds ago 10@usenet.premiumize.me recieved unknown status code 400 for article ExOtMnHzYeTeXbPrQpMqQcEd-1658672646626@nyuu: 400 Archive server temporarily offline WARNING a few seconds ago 5@usenet.premiumize.me recieved unknown st...
- March 11th, 2024, 1:53 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
And without "Check before download", no Traceback, but again the weird response immediatly at the beginning of the download And the download succeeds. So OP, turn off the "check before download" WARNING 10 minutes ago 11@usenet.premiumize.me: Received unknown status code 400 for ...
- March 11th, 2024, 1:50 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
- Replies: 28
- Views: 708
Re: Fatal error in Downloader - invalid literal for int() with base 10
Ignore my hypothesis above about proxmox/docker! Because: OP give me the problematic NZB, and with "Check before download" on, I do get the Traceback ... in the checking phase: 2024-03-11 18:05:54,488::DEBUG::[downloader:744] Article <hcqsDHTqW6xYgZU7ss@d106420829d7979391nvei38GALVE6L35cyB...