Support Forum

check out the other thread in which you posted ... full explanation & howto

ckp33 wrote: ↑April 17th, 2024, 10:43 pm seems to have started this problem only after upgrading to sab 4.2.3

To verify your hypothesis, you can downgrade to sab 4.2.2

Hint: I don't think so.

@safihre

I find defaulting to 0.0 confusing.

Have we considered returning float('nan') in case of problems? Or just -1? So that we can recognize.

So after looking through my docker logs, I was able to find this error - validate protocol negotiate failed: -11 If I google "validate protocol negotiate failed: -11" it gives hits with SMB / CIFS. So filesystem (mount) problem. Indeed you should solve that; not a SABnzbd problem. Good th...

OK. This is how SABnzbd does it: https://github.com/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/blob/develop/sabnzbd/filesystem.py#L1059 Can you do this within your docker, within the SABnzbd directory sander@brixit:~$ cd git/sabnzbd/ # go to directory with SABnzbd.py What does OS say, for working directory: $ df -h . Filesyst...

Indeed: HOW it reports.

I'll check how sabnzbd via a python call checks free system

BRB

I do a lot of Usenet downloading across several SABnzbd clients. Why not one SAB client? One SAB client on a recent i3 core can handle 2500 Mbps downloads. I use sonarr to download documentaries, and it automatically pushes the downloads between 4 sabnzbd clients - the load is usually spread equall...

most people use LSIO's SABnzbd docker image

Ah, yes: #UnraidAlert. Unraid and SABnzbd are not friends. A lot of problems, and I've never seen a solution.

In your SAB on docker on Unraid: where is your Incomplete dir? Put it inside the docker, not on the host.

What happens when you create a new VM with a fresh SABnzbd setup?

Do not touch bandwidth settings.

After a download, in the Wrench, is there anything about "download speed limited by"?

How many connections have you have defined per newsserver?

Have you set a download bandwidth limit?

Have you tried with the reference test download via the Wrench?

Where on earth are you?

Yes, also SABnzbd docker on Linux is slower than SABnzbd straight on Linux.

SABnzbd on docker is slower than SABnzbd straight on Linux

SABnzbd on docker on Windows has yet another layer: Linux VM is in between. So indeed slower.

A fix? Run SABnzbd straight on Windows for the best speed.

We can spend more and more time on that ... or we can spend time on your original remark:

"the next day I wanted to fix them"

My question to you: how do you want to fix them?