Support Forum

> Hi, on the speed check site 180 Mbps Then contact your ISP: you pay for 1000 Mbps, so then 180 Mbps is much too low. It might be your LAN, but let your ISP determine it. ping times: what do you get with news.newsdemon.com ? And what if you fill that out in SABnzbd? SAB will find the quickest serve...

That's bad.

What is your ping time to the newsservers?

> Internet Bandwidth 20.1 MB/s 160.8 Mbps

Not good either if you have a 1000 Mbps connection. On the same system, what is your speed on https://fast.com/ ? And on another PC on your LAN?

I'm having the same problem on a OMV6 install. Using an AMD A8-3870 APU and 16gb ram. The AMD A8-3870 is a CPU from 2011, so old x86-microarchicture. And rar7 dumps core on that. Not in the hands of the SABnzbd team. Workaround is doing the job for me as well, but it would be nice if there would be...

The 503 is correctly handled in the first version after 4.2.3

If you want to verify that now: run the docker nightly, or the windows binary from github

https://github.com/sabnzbd/sabnzbd/blob ... er.py#L775

Seems a bug in unrar itself ... on old hardware ... ?

So which CPU are you using?

https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-s ... issues/219

So ... just a tiil on your own Mac?

::ffff:192.168.65.1 is a notation of 192.168.65.1. So is 192.168.65.x your LAN network? If yes, then find that device and exterminate it. Kill it with fire. If not, then I wonder how it possible at all. Also: your SAB is in docker on Mac ... so I'm surprised another device can contact it all ... tha...

2024-03-12 22:56:11,492::DEBUG::[newsunpack:860] UNRAR output: UNRAR 7.00 freeware Copyright (c) 1993-2024 Alexander Roshal 2024-03-12 22:56:11,493::INFO::[newsunpack:863] Unpacked 0 files/folders in 0 seconds Weird. A thing with unrar 7.00 (or the options you use)? Or your filesystem? What if you ...

The \x00 was debug output. And/but Safihre made clear 1on1 that is NOT caused by the newsserver (but a SAB internal method)

But this only happens when it's pre-checking, right? I'll turn of checking for now, and report to them. I'm using them because they bundle with a bunch of other services that I use. Thank you Sander! No: see https://forums.sabnzbd.org/viewtopic.php?p=131530#p131530 "And without "Check bef...

This happens only at the beginning of a job, right? I can drop a support ticket and let them know their downloads are 400-ing in the beginning. Is it possible that this behaviour is interfering with the checking script? Yes, at the beginning. It looks like the server is not yet ready / is spinning ...

My conclusion:

usenet.premiumize.me produces total and random garbage. Non-standard. Not something SAB should try to handle.

My advice: complain at them, or dump them and choose a reliable news provider

And the problematic nzb: 2024-03-11 20:24:29,726::DEBUG::[newswrapper:97] SJ 200: bytearray(b'R>\r\n0 <iAdIWztxRMwPakAtm8Fh@0d673917d82003195SYgm3DUmevgaPMqTvAD\n\r\n (no posting)\r\n\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00') 2024-03-11 20:24:29,727::INFO::[notifier:1...

garbage in the answer in the precheck: thousands of \x00 (limited to 80 characters in logging below) 2024-03-11 20:17:12,608::DEBUG::[newswrapper:97] SJ 200: bytearray(b'223 0 <JxFgMzBwLqVoRcPuJzHoSgFy-1658672651406@nyuu>\r\n@premiumize.me (no posting)\r\n\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00...

More fun, with the 100MB test download, with sabnzbd WARNING a few seconds ago 10@usenet.premiumize.me recieved unknown status code 400 for article ExOtMnHzYeTeXbPrQpMqQcEd-1658672646626@nyuu: 400 Archive server temporarily offline WARNING a few seconds ago 5@usenet.premiumize.me recieved unknown st...