3.0 Alpha 2 Windows 10 - Performance and Speed Tests

Questions and bug reports for Beta releases should be posted here.
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Post Reply
hl2guide
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 71
Joined: August 31st, 2016, 3:17 am

3.0 Alpha 2 Windows 10 - Performance and Speed Tests

Post by hl2guide »

Please consider looking into the performance and speed tests in 3.0.

For me the "real world results" are mixed:

Disk Speed Results:
- CrystalDiskMark says about 60MB/s
- SAB says about 13MB/s

Internet Bandwidth Results:
- SpeedTest says about 5MB/s (40 Mbps)
- SAB says about 1.4MB/s (11.2 Mbps)

Image
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 8811
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: 3.0 Alpha 2 Windows 10 - Performance and Speed Tests

Post by sander »

When you did the test: was SABnzbd downloading an NZB/post?
hl2guide
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 71
Joined: August 31st, 2016, 3:17 am

Re: 3.0 Alpha 2 Windows 10 - Performance and Speed Tests

Post by hl2guide »

No, it was a paused queue.
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 8811
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: 3.0 Alpha 2 Windows 10 - Performance and Speed Tests

Post by sander »

Ah, good.

The speed tests are just a quick indication: slow, medium, fast.

Out of curiosity: in the same screen, if you do a Test Download -> 1000MB, what speed do you get?
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 8811
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: 3.0 Alpha 2 Windows 10 - Performance and Speed Tests

Post by sander »

Well ... ?
Post Reply