3.0.0Beta1 installed, not sure why I got a beta version?

Support for the Debian/Ubuntu package, created by JCFP.
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Post Reply
clm000
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: June 2nd, 2020, 11:31 am

3.0.0Beta1 installed, not sure why I got a beta version?

Post by clm000 »

I'm running Ubuntu Bionic (18.04LTS). I setup the nobetas repository (sudo add-apt-repository ppa:jcfp/nobetas). I ran apt-get update/upgrade and somehow got the 3.0.0Beta1 version of Sabnzbdplus installed. I thought I should "receive only final stable releases". Below is an "ls" of my /etc/apt/sources.list.d for reference. I'm not the strongest Ubuntu admin/user so it is probably a simple mistake on my part, but any help would be appreciated. I hope this topic is in the right place, pardon me if it is not.
_____________________________________________________
total 120
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 2 00:14 .
drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Apr 25 22:55 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 Jun 2 00:14 b-rad-ubuntu-kernel_mediatree_hauppauge-bionic.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 168 Jun 2 00:14 b-rad-ubuntu-kernel_mediatree_hauppauge-bionic.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 67 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-bionic.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 67 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-bionic.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 160 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-xenial.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 128 Jul 13 2019 jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-xenial.list.distUpgrade
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 160 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-xenial.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 120 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-ppa-bionic.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 120 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-ppa-bionic.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 70 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-sab-addons-bionic.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 306 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-sab-addons-xenial.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 274 Jul 13 2019 jcfp-ubuntu-sab-addons-xenial.list.distUpgrade
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 308 Jun 2 00:14 jcfp-ubuntu-sab-addons-xenial.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 54 Jun 2 00:14 mediaarea.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 54 Jun 2 00:14 mediaarea.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 103 Jun 2 00:14 mono-official-stable.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 69 Jul 13 2019 mono-official-stable.list.distUpgrade
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 103 Jun 2 00:14 mono-official-stable.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 95 Jun 2 00:14 mono-xamarin.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 61 Jul 13 2019 mono-xamarin.list.distUpgrade
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 95 Jun 2 00:14 mono-xamarin.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68 Jun 2 00:14 ombi.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 68 Jun 2 00:14 ombi.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51 Jun 2 00:14 plexmediaserver.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51 Jul 13 2019 plexmediaserver.list.distUpgrade
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51 Jun 2 00:14 plexmediaserver.list.save
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45 Jun 2 00:14 sonarr.list
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45 Jun 2 00:14 sonarr.list.save
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 8830
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: 3.0.0Beta1 installed, not sure why I got a beta version?

Post by sander »

I would say the "jcfp-ubuntu-ppa-bionic" is the mainstream PPA, which is with beta's. See https://sabnzbd.org/wiki/installation/i ... buntu-repo

Indeed you have also included jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-bionic, but I guess that because the main PPA offers a newer SABnzbd (3.x), that is installed.

FWIW: I would say you're better off with 3.0.0-beta2, than with the old SAB 2.x.
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 8830
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: 3.0.0Beta1 installed, not sure why I got a beta version?

Post by sander »

BTW: my guess is that the command below shows the PPA that was used: "jcfp_ppa_ubuntu"

Code: Select all

sander@brixit:~$ apt-cache showpkg sabnzbdplus | head -5
Package: sabnzbdplus
Versions: 
3.0.0~beta2-0ubuntu1~jcfp1~18.04 (/var/lib/apt/lists/ppa.launchpad.net_jcfp_ppa_ubuntu_dists_bionic_main_binary-amd64_Packages) (/var/lib/apt/lists/ppa.launchpad.net_jcfp_ppa_ubuntu_dists_bionic_main_binary-i386_Packages) (/var/lib/dpkg/status)
 Description Language: 
                 File: /var/lib/apt/lists/nl.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_bionic_multiverse_binary-amd64_Packages
clm000
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 2
Joined: June 2nd, 2020, 11:31 am

Re: 3.0.0Beta1 installed, not sure why I got a beta version?

Post by clm000 »

Thank you very much for the help, greatly appreciated and you are correct about apt-cache output showing mainstream PPA (with Beta's) explaining the upgrade. I looked at the 3.0Beta2 changes and I guess your probably right (python 2 is old). This system was installed as Xenial (16.04LTS), then upgraded to Bionic. There are xenial PPA's listed still (e.g. jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-xenial.list, jcfp-ubuntu-sab-addons-xenial.list.distUpgrade, jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas-xenial.list.save, etc.). Can/should I just remove all the existing PPA's with xenial along with all the jcfp-ubuntu-nobetas... PPA's using add-apt-repository --remove to effectively clean up my PPA list? Thanks for any help you can provide.
User avatar
sander
Release Testers
Release Testers
Posts: 8830
Joined: January 22nd, 2008, 2:22 pm

Re: 3.0.0Beta1 installed, not sure why I got a beta version?

Post by sander »

Oh, you're right.

I just remove PPA hard-core by removing the file or line in /etc/apt/ ...
Post Reply