Hi,
Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12, not SAB 0.5.0
Is it still possible to get 0.5.0 into Ubuntu 10.04, or is it too late?
Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
Forum rules
Help us help you:
Help us help you:
- Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
- Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
- Adhere to the forum rules.
- Do you experience problems during downloading?
Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings. - Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
Please don't send me unrequested PM's; the forum is the best way to communicate.
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
Currently awaiting sponsorship in debian (for sabnzbdplus as well as the required version of cherrypy3). So work in progress, no guarantees though as I'm simply not in control of the uploading to the distros.
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
And Ubuntu 'inherits' SAB from Debian?
About cherrypy3: is the standard cherrypy on Ubuntu still 2.x? http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/python-cherrypy
I did this:
1) Installed SABnzbdplus from the standard Ubuntu repository to get the needed libraries
2) Downloaded SABnzbd-0.5.0-src.tar.gz , and run that.
Does that mean I use the cherrypy (3?) included in SABnzbd-0.5.0-src.tar.gz, and not the cherrypy (2?) from the standard Ubuntu repository?
About cherrypy3: is the standard cherrypy on Ubuntu still 2.x? http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/python-cherrypy
I did this:
1) Installed SABnzbdplus from the standard Ubuntu repository to get the needed libraries
2) Downloaded SABnzbd-0.5.0-src.tar.gz , and run that.
Does that mean I use the cherrypy (3?) included in SABnzbd-0.5.0-src.tar.gz, and not the cherrypy (2?) from the standard Ubuntu repository?
Please don't send me unrequested PM's; the forum is the best way to communicate.
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
Yes to both. There's a python-cherrypy3 package too, but it's not yet new enough for 0.5.0 to work with.sander wrote:And Ubuntu 'inherits' SAB from Debian?
Does that mean I use the cherrypy (3?) included in SABnzbd-0.5.0-src.tar.gz, and not the cherrypy (2?) from the standard Ubuntu repository?
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
CherryPy is a constant headache for use.
We use an interim 3.2.0 release with a couple of patches.
2.x releases are totally incompatible.
With 3.1.0 https is simply unusable and is incompatible.
3.2.0RC1 contains another serious https bug and is again incompatible
with what we use.
We use an interim 3.2.0 release with a couple of patches.
2.x releases are totally incompatible.
With 3.1.0 https is simply unusable and is incompatible.
3.2.0RC1 contains another serious https bug and is again incompatible
with what we use.
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
0.5.0 is in lucid/10.04 now, with the cherrypy3 code that comes with the program releases included in the package.
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
Wow! Thank you!jcfp wrote: 0.5.0 is in lucid/10.04 now, with the cherrypy3 code that comes with the program releases included in the package.
Please don't send me unrequested PM's; the forum is the best way to communicate.
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
I'm now on Ubuntu 10.04, and trying to install SABnzbd, I got the message below
After enabling Universe (or Multiverse?), everything was OK.
After enabling Universe (or Multiverse?), everything was OK.
Code: Select all
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install sabnzbdplus
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sabnzbdplus: Depends: python-feedparser but it is not installable
Depends: sabnzbdplus-theme-smpl (= 0.5.0-2) but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: python-yenc (>= 0.3) but it is not installable
Recommends: par2 (>= 0.4) but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$
Please don't send me unrequested PM's; the forum is the best way to communicate.
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
No surprise there, to get those errors you must have had multiverse enabled but not universe. That is asking for trouble, since any package is free to have dependencies from both their own and 'higher' repositories (with "main" being top level).sander wrote:After enabling Universe (or Multiverse?), everything was OK.
Re: Ubuntu 10.04 Beta1 still has SABnzbd+ 0.4.12
Yeah, I know. I just posted this because the (error) message looks different than in earlier Ubuntu versions. However, I might be wrong about that.jcfp wrote:No surprise there, to get those errors you must have had multiverse enabled but not universe. That is asking for trouble, since any package is free to have dependencies from both their own and 'higher' repositories (with "main" being top level).sander wrote:After enabling Universe (or Multiverse?), everything was OK.
Please don't send me unrequested PM's; the forum is the best way to communicate.
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
If someone helps you, please reply to that help.
f you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate