Synology Docker Unifi Controller port conflict

Get help with all aspects of SABnzbd
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
User avatar
safihre
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 5335
Joined: April 30th, 2015, 7:35 am
Contact:

Re: Synology Docker Unifi Controller port conflict

Post by safihre »

I'm sorry but I can't be of much help.. We have used that port for ages, it only conflicts if you have a manual package installed that also uses that port. Despite the manual text, for all other users it seems to work.
Maybe indeed try to see which other package is on port 8080 by just navigating to http://your-nas:8080
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
jagerx9
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: March 22nd, 2016, 3:49 pm

Re: Synology Docker Unifi Controller port conflict

Post by jagerx9 »

Just bumping this as I have the same problem. Can I grab the spk from somewhere and modify it somehow? I just need to change the default service port. The makefile has it specified as 8080 but I'm not sure how to manually install with this change.

https://github.com/SynoCommunity/spksrc ... d/Makefile

Unifi won't play nice on another port. And running sabnzbd in docker seems to be bugged in that I keep getting a "datadir" instead of the requested mount locations.
PilipHannah
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: July 20th, 2021, 7:30 am

Re: Synology Docker Unifi Controller port conflict

Post by PilipHannah »

Maybe easiest to just ditch the Synology Community version of SABnzbd and opt for the Docker version where I can control the ports directly to employee monitoring software and transparently. It seems like there is some configuration w/ the Synology Community package that 'holds / reserves' 8080 even if the app doesn't eventually use it (which is also why it wouldn't let me install the package until I had turned off my Docker that was using it.
User avatar
safihre
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 5335
Joined: April 30th, 2015, 7:35 am
Contact:

Re: Synology Docker Unifi Controller port conflict

Post by safihre »

Yes, the DSM package system requires you to reserve the port. It's hardcoded so can't be changed after the package is compiled and signed.
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Post Reply