Page 1 of 1

Anyone else issues with a slow sabnzbd?

Posted: October 10th, 2018, 12:37 am
by Titusjames
Hi all I recently moved house and hav acess to faster internet than before. Around 60mb down.

But this seems to be causing issues with SAbNZBD. Every time it starts to unpack during a download it’s becomes unresponsive the starts loosing connection to the service on the web browser. Download speed drops down to killabytes then jumps up and down.

I have it running on a Ubuntu 16.04 vm on vmware esxi. It has 4 3ghz cores and 6gb of ram. So sure that should be enough? Running top seems to show it only using a small percentage of resource. Does anyone have any suggestions ?

Re: Anyone else issues with a slow sabnzbd?

Posted: October 10th, 2018, 2:31 am
by safihre
Did you always have it as a VM? It sounds like something like that.
What if you run it on the host directly?
Could also be a combination of settings?

Re: Anyone else issues with a slow sabnzbd?

Posted: October 11th, 2018, 4:55 am
by Titusjames
[quote=What if you run it on the host directly?
[/quote]

I didn't know i haven't tried

Re: Anyone else issues with a slow sabnzbd?

Posted: October 11th, 2018, 4:56 am
by Titusjames
[quote=Could also be a combination of settings?
[/quote]
I don't know i will let you know

Re: Anyone else issues with a slow sabnzbd?

Posted: October 17th, 2018, 7:03 am
by zeroday
version 2.3.4 is working fine here, when upgraded to 2.3.5 I noticed severe drop in speed and performance.
I forced a downgrade of sab and all went ok. I'm on a VM linux server which is performing fine (+23MB/s on a 200Mbit line)

It could have been an issue with a network change (suddenly I have als IPv6 avail on my network, which is a little troublesome as I do not want my machines to use it) .. ;)

So right now downgraded and waiting for enough confidence to try it again ..

Re: Anyone else issues with a slow sabnzbd?

Posted: October 17th, 2018, 7:14 am
by safihre
We didn't change any network or performance code in 2.3.5, only post-processing things. So it shouldn't be the case, I think/