All my NAS (two more expensive QNAP ones and one cheap D-Link) support SMS Notifications, for example clickatell.com
It's actually really simple to implement since at least clickatell offers an API to send SMS (AFAIK it's a single HTTPS call).
Notifications via SMS
Re: Notifications via SMS
You can write a post processing script for that.
Re: Notifications via SMS
Yes right, but having it implemented in SABnzbd would be much cooler because then you could get "Warning: Low Quota" or "Warning: Low Disk Space" messages right on your phone - even when you're in a meeting. Most people don't get emails pushed to their phones but just eg. every 30 minutes.
Re: Notifications via SMS
Hahah, shouldn't you be paying attention to the meeting? ;-)an3k wrote:Yes right, but having it implemented in SABnzbd would be much cooler because then you could get "Warning: Low Quota" or "Warning: Low Disk Space" messages right on your phone - even when you're in a meeting. Most people don't get emails pushed to their phones but just eg. every 30 minutes.
I think this is a feature that would only be applicable for a small group of users that have SMS capabilities on server, so that's why a custom post-proc script is better.
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
Re: Notifications via SMS
Hehe well, that depends on whats written in that SMSsafihre wrote:Hahah, shouldn't you be paying attention to the meeting? ;-)an3k wrote:Yes right, but having it implemented in SABnzbd would be much cooler because then you could get "Warning: Low Quota" or "Warning: Low Disk Space" messages right on your phone - even when you're in a meeting. Most people don't get emails pushed to their phones but just eg. every 30 minutes.
Sorry you misunderstood me. Everybody can buy eg. 500 SMS for a low price from these SMS Providers like clickatell.com You then can use their API to send SMS. All you need is Internet. Everyone who can run SABnzbd can definitely use SMS. There's no requirement for "SMS capabilities on server".safihre wrote:I think this is a feature that would only be applicable for a small group of users that have SMS capabilities on server, so that's why a custom post-proc script is better.