I see version 1.2.2 on the release page, but dont see any related commits on master.
Can we get that so we can package version 1.2.2?
Search found 30 matches
- February 27th, 2017, 12:37 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
- February 23rd, 2017, 10:11 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
Just use the master branch, we only push there in case of a new stable release. Indeed the tags are on develop, without the version set. The ports system must be able to just wget or curl a file? Not just git tags? Any reason the releases can't reference the master branch? That way anyone can just ...
- February 23rd, 2017, 10:02 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
Just use the master branch, we only push there in case of a new stable release. Indeed the tags are on develop, without the version set. The ports system must be able to just wget or curl a file? Not just git tags? You can set just a URL to download from using MASTER_SITES, but I think the FreeBSD ...
- February 23rd, 2017, 10:01 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
Clearly you skipped over mine, JCFP's and @nahun's first advice: Use the official tarball releases. Why would you possibly be pulling from the develop branch for a port/package? ??? If you keep insisting to go against our advice of using the official releases that everything you need inside, you sh...
- February 23rd, 2017, 12:39 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
Hi @safihre I was wondering if you could help us with one more issue with the FreeBSD port/package? Thanks to @nahun we now have the port building the locale files from github's source, but this caused another small issue. The sabnzbd/verson.py file is now not up to date. Is there a proper way to ge...
- January 28th, 2017, 12:52 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: 1.2.0: Unpacking failed, an expected file was not unpacked
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16197
Re: 1.2.0: Unpacking failed, an expected file was not unpack
I should have some time this Sunday night to try and reproduce this.
- January 28th, 2017, 11:08 am
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: 1.2.0: Unpacking failed, an expected file was not unpacked
- Replies: 15
- Views: 16197
Re: 1.2.0: Unpacking failed, an expected file was not unpack
@safihre
The FreeNAS plugin has unrar v5.10 packaged. Is there a minimum required version for sabnzbd v1.2.0?
I see FreeBSD has the latest version (v5.40) available so I can update the plugin to use that.
The FreeNAS plugin has unrar v5.10 packaged. Is there a minimum required version for sabnzbd v1.2.0?
I see FreeBSD has the latest version (v5.40) available so I can update the plugin to use that.
- November 25th, 2016, 5:51 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
Ok I installed the freebsd port py27-python-gettext
http://www.freshports.org/textproc/py-python-gettext/
But, I still get the same error as earlier.
http://www.freshports.org/textproc/py-python-gettext/
But, I still get the same error as earlier.
Code: Select all
Missing "/usr/ports/news/sabnzbdplus/work/sabnzbd-1.1.1/tools/msgfmt.py". Please install this package first.
- November 25th, 2016, 12:12 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
whoops sorry, I could tell it was saying to install a dependency. I though it was saying to install that file which already existed.
ok I'll try this out soon
ok I'll try this out soon
- November 25th, 2016, 3:06 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
ok, so if I'm in the correct directory I get the second error I posted above related to msgfmt.py
any idea what I could be missing?
yeah, I may just use the build you just want to see if using the source directly is possible as well. Thanks
any idea what I could be missing?
yeah, I may just use the build you just want to see if using the source directly is possible as well. Thanks
- November 24th, 2016, 11:51 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
Ok, the port will only be based on releases anyway so branch doesn't matter. I tried running '/usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/ports/news/sabnzbdplus/work/sabnzbd-1.1.1/tools/make_mo.py' during our port setip, and I think an "email" folder is created but nothing else. The below is outputted. ...
- November 23rd, 2016, 2:27 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
@safihre
Ok, mostly converted the FreeBSD port over. I noticed the locale folder does not exist in the release posted on github. Should package maintainers be generating that somehow?
Ok, mostly converted the FreeBSD port over. I noticed the locale folder does not exist in the release posted on github. Should package maintainers be generating that somehow?
- November 23rd, 2016, 1:33 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
Re: sourceforge
sounds good, I'll make the changes to the port then
- November 22nd, 2016, 12:09 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: sourceforge
- Replies: 22
- Views: 14543
sourceforge
are official releases no longer hosted on sourceforge? I'm the maintainer of the FreeBSD port and FreeNAS plugin and wanted to know if I should migrate the port to use github from now on.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- September 22nd, 2015, 6:57 pm
- Forum: General Help
- Topic: NAS Purchase ??
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2083
Re: NAS Purchase ??
Not sure if you would consider it easy or not but FreeNAS has plugins for all the programs you mention.