Filtering works fine with &search= but nzo_ids= appears not to work
example url http://localhost:8090/api?mode=history& ... o_h90pjip7
this returns all results in the history, not just the one matching SABnzbd_nzo_h90pjip7
is this a known issue or have I got a malformed url?
thanks
queue/history results not filtered on nzb_ids
Forum rules
Help us help you:
Help us help you:
- Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
- Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
- Adhere to the forum rules.
- Do you experience problems during downloading?
Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings. - Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: April 24th, 2021, 5:19 am
Re: queue/history results not filtered on nzb_ids
The url looks fine. What version of sabnzbd are you using? Filtering by nzo_ids was added in 3.2.0b1.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: April 24th, 2021, 5:19 am
Re: queue/history results not filtered on nzb_ids
Ah ok thanks, didnt realise it was so recent addition, I am on 3.1.1
Re: queue/history results not filtered on nzb_ids
Is your job still in post processing? I see now that the filter doesn't work for jobs that are still post processing (that's a bug indeed).
For finished jobs it should work.
For finished jobs it should work.
If you like our support, check our special newsserver deal or donate at: https://sabnzbd.org/donate
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: April 24th, 2021, 5:19 am
Re: queue/history results not filtered on nzb_ids
The problem was I was on sabnzbd 3.1.1
Filtering on name works so I will stay using that for now. I expect filtering on nzb_ids will be more efficient.
Thanks for the fast response
Filtering on name works so I will stay using that for now. I expect filtering on nzb_ids will be more efficient.
Thanks for the fast response