Connections page & Missing parts

Get help with all aspects of SABnzbd
Forum rules
Help us help you:
  • Are you using the latest stable version of SABnzbd? Downloads page.
  • Tell us what system you run SABnzbd on.
  • Adhere to the forum rules.
  • Do you experience problems during downloading?
    Check your connection in Status and Interface settings window.
    Use Test Server in Config > Servers.
    We will probably ask you to do a test using only basic settings.
  • Do you experience problems during repair or unpacking?
    Enable +Debug logging in the Status and Interface settings window and share the relevant parts of the log here using [ code ] sections.
Post Reply
ncjok
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 21
Joined: January 13th, 2010, 5:20 pm

Connections page & Missing parts

Post by ncjok »

Just recently I've had a few broken downloads due to missing parts and insufficient pars available to effect repair.

I am curious to understand the information presented in the connections page of the SABnzbd+ interface; an example is presented below:

Image

Here you can see I have two accounts, Supernews as primary and Astraweb as a backup due to their higher retention. Using Supernews, however, I am frequently seeing reference to Astraweb alongside the active connection threads. I am wondering if this indicates that the parts are actually coming from Astraweb's servers or is it some sort of tag which denotes the server to which the articles were first uploaded?

I went with Supernews as a primary subscription with the impression that they were a Giganews reseller and that I should expect a high level of service. This has been the case for the lifetime of my subscription until recently. There are a number of discussions which advise users to possibly expect missing or incomplete articles on Astraweb's servers and I was mindful of this when I selected them as a backup provider.

If Supernews are providing access to Astraweb's servers then one account is clearly redundant and I am wasting some money. I wouldn't go with Astraweb as a primary provider although they do provide high retention at an attractive price.

Can somebody please confirm the interpretation of my screenshot?
Thanks.
User avatar
shypike
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 19774
Joined: January 18th, 2008, 12:49 pm

Re: Connections page & Missing parts

Post by shypike »

What you see are the unique article identifiers (as they are listed in the NZB file).
They usually contain the name of the Usenet provider where they were originally uploaded.
You will only see warnings when none of your servers has the article.

BTW: this abundance of warnings will be replaced by a simple "missing" summary
in the next major release.
As long as you have enough par2 files, who cares about individual missing articles?
ncjok
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 21
Joined: January 13th, 2010, 5:20 pm

Re: Connections page & Missing parts

Post by ncjok »

shypike wrote: What you see are the unique article identifiers (as they are listed in the NZB file).
They usually contain the name of the Usenet provider where they were originally uploaded.
This is the interpretation I was looking for, thank you.

I misunderstood the display and wondered if Supernews were in some way redirecting me to Astraweb's servers.

Ultimately, I will conclude that the original upload to Astraweb was broken and did not include enough parity information for repair. This propagated around Usenet and presumably noone would be able to successfully download this release. It is somewhat interesting given that Binsearch, from where I acquired the NZB, did not indicate any parts were missing.
Last edited by ncjok on September 19th, 2010, 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply